A Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Affluence and Deprivation Are Found Side by Side in Across England.
Within Nunsthorpe, inhabitants live in homes just a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in nearby Scartho. One 1.8-metre-high barricade literally divides the two communities in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off roads and walkways that previously connected them.
“It’s the divide between rich and poor,” said Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Analysis of official figures shows the extent of disparity can run, sometimes over little more than a few metres of asphalt, a line of hedges or a wall. Years of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood ranking as one of the poorest in the country.
The geographical widening of poverty has led to a significant increase in the quantity of locations where deprived and affluent people find themselves as immediate neighbours. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest areas adjoined one of the wealthiest. This number rose to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Does More Than Separate Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the UK and painfully obvious. The wall is much more than a metaphorical division; it causes very real problems for everyday life.
- The school commute that should take a quarter of an hour become an sixty-minute detour.
- Access to important amenities like grocery stores, schools and employment centres is hindered.
- The site often sees vandalism and loitering, with reports of litter being thrown over the wall and other problems.
“You try to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you reside facing that,” said one local, motioning at the rusted barricade.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At Centre4, staff emphasise that need transcends addresses. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” said director a community leader.
Regardless of ranking in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a strong sense and feeling of togetherness among its inhabitants. By contrast, the neighbouring area is classified among the most prosperous 10% nationally.
Echoes Elsewhere: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope area in Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by spacious houses built in the early 2000s that sit in the top 10% for job prospects and living environment.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said Phil Hockley, aged 63. “You’ll probably find a lot of people over there don’t even speak to each other.”
The economic gap is evident: an average family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side equivalent properties fetch about £410,000.
Locals speak of a tangible feeling of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood gets ignored,” stated holistic health worker Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our facilities have slowly been taken away, and the majority of the issues we face here are to do with poverty.”
The rise in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a picture of an increasingly segregated society, where wealth and deprivation are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.