🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about the comments made by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player during the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued drought of American men at the majors: none of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best players in the world in succession. He is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful strength on both forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, he is often helpless. The past few seasons has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has made a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When he finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous game to drop serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the contest twice on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not only say his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for America not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {