🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. He weathered an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for using too much that system. Hire the project manager and later bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.