🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that could add as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the delicate balance of power in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries established after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's ruling. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision occurs during a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Typically, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation aligned with Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives decried the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior House figure argued the court had once again damaged its legitimacy by upholding a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.